Blog Archive
Popular Posts
-
I found this book for free on the web via the excellent Moneysavingexpert website. This book broadly argues that whilst stock mark...
-
Many investing books focus on “get rich quick” strategies. These tend to be around picking specific shares or times to enter or exit the m...
-
This is a relatively brief book that looks at the causes of The First World War. It does not contain any new research and there is not much...
-
Slavery is topical at the moment with the release of 12 Years as a Slave. It was not an area I knew much about, and I assumed the end o...
-
I Am The Secret Footballer supposedly lift the lid on the life of a premiership footballer. It is anonymous and so is supposed to offer ...
-
So you want to get rich and become a millionaire? Perhaps this book will tell you how. The approach taken has been to sample or survey a l...
-
Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class analyses the way the white working classes have been demonised and ridiculed in popular cul...
-
Particle at the end of the Universe aims to explain the Higgs Boson and how it has been discovered. I have read this book once, but feel...
-
This book looks at time; why time seems to flow in one direction? Why can we not remember the future? This is a more complex puzzle than i...
-
King Arthur is a popular source of myth and legend. This book looks to investigate the truth behind the legend. The overall conclusion is ...
Powered by Blogger.
Search This Blog
Friday, 4 May 2012
An
interesting idea for a book. It claims we can deduce much about a
person from their living or working space.
The book starts by detailing the big five traits of psychology
The book starts by detailing the big five traits of psychology
Openness - how willing you are to experience new things
Conscientiousness - organisation
Extraversion - outgoingness
Agreeableness - how much you like other people
Neuroticism - worrying
The book goes on to argue that you can read clues about these traits from people’s living space. However mostly it is on merely two of these traits. If a person is open they are likely to have a wide range of books and if a person is very tidy then they are likely to be conscientious.
In many ways the book seems to argue that snooping might not be so useful. In general people tend to underestimate context(except with regard to themselves), and the book argues it is hard to deduce much from a few cues. For example, a messy person can tidy up or certain items can belong to other people or company policy might change the way a person’s desk is set up, etc. And things such as music tastes or drinking tastes are less important than we imagine.
The big problem with this book is that it obvious that conscientious organised people are likely to have organised personal spaces and open people are likely to have interesting reading material. This book counsels against making big deductive jumps, but that rather limits the scope of snooping. Snooping can be quite good at determining gender and the attractiveness of people (by the photographs of their partners).
The book is quite long as the author goes into various anecdotes about experiment he has done with college students. It is actually quite interesting, although I found myself a bit disappointed at the end of the book to discover that there aren’t really a set of rules that turn us into super snoopers and that in practice it is not such a good way to find out about people.
I enjoyed this book, but it is a bit of a guilt pleasure kind of book than on that will change lives or offers much in the way of deep insight.
Labels:
Psychology
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment