Popular Posts
-
I found this book for free on the web via the excellent Moneysavingexpert website. This book broadly argues that whilst stock mark...
-
Many investing books focus on “get rich quick” strategies. These tend to be around picking specific shares or times to enter or exit the m...
-
This is a relatively brief book that looks at the causes of The First World War. It does not contain any new research and there is not much...
-
Slavery is topical at the moment with the release of 12 Years as a Slave. It was not an area I knew much about, and I assumed the end o...
-
I Am The Secret Footballer supposedly lift the lid on the life of a premiership footballer. It is anonymous and so is supposed to offer ...
-
So you want to get rich and become a millionaire? Perhaps this book will tell you how. The approach taken has been to sample or survey a l...
-
Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class analyses the way the white working classes have been demonised and ridiculed in popular cul...
-
Particle at the end of the Universe aims to explain the Higgs Boson and how it has been discovered. I have read this book once, but feel...
-
This book looks at time; why time seems to flow in one direction? Why can we not remember the future? This is a more complex puzzle than i...
-
King Arthur is a popular source of myth and legend. This book looks to investigate the truth behind the legend. The overall conclusion is ...
Powered by Blogger.
Search This Blog
Monday, 29 July 2013
This book looks at time; why time seems to flow in one direction? Why can we not remember the future?
This is a more complex puzzle than it appears as the laws of physics are all reversable, they all work if you run them backwards - provided you make certain other changes. For example you could reverse time with the earth rotating around the sun, but you would need to also reverse the direction and angular momentum.
The author explains how the tendency of entropy to increase differentiates the future from the past. The future is more "chaotic". He does this by explaining statistical mechanics in a reality easy to explain way.
After this he asks why the Big Bang, the start of the universe, was such an ordered state and how we found ourselves to be here. The short answer is nobody knows so there is much speculation and he dips into quantum physics, black holes, whether we could build a time machine and multiple universes. The book becomes more speculative as it goes on.
The author ends with a model that involves our universe being a sort of bubble universe that broke away, it emerged as a flux in a larger empty space with just periodic fluctations(something called a De Sitter space which is basically empty space with just virtual particles popping in and out of existence). I read a similiar theory in Roger Penroses Cycles of Time, but I found that book far harder to read.
This is a good book, especially the first half. The author avoids the use of mathematics to describe his theories and so is forced to use analogies in the Stephen Hawkins style. I am sure this means leaving out some of the depth as analogies are rarely perfect. But most of us lack the ability to perform the mathematics, so this is probably a wise step especially when it comes to book sales. I found the second half grew a little more speculative, but it is a book I have read on more than one occasion. It seems a bit more advanced than other books that endless recount twin astronauts travelling at different speeds. And the range of material is quite vast.
This is a more complex puzzle than it appears as the laws of physics are all reversable, they all work if you run them backwards - provided you make certain other changes. For example you could reverse time with the earth rotating around the sun, but you would need to also reverse the direction and angular momentum.
The author explains how the tendency of entropy to increase differentiates the future from the past. The future is more "chaotic". He does this by explaining statistical mechanics in a reality easy to explain way.
After this he asks why the Big Bang, the start of the universe, was such an ordered state and how we found ourselves to be here. The short answer is nobody knows so there is much speculation and he dips into quantum physics, black holes, whether we could build a time machine and multiple universes. The book becomes more speculative as it goes on.
The author ends with a model that involves our universe being a sort of bubble universe that broke away, it emerged as a flux in a larger empty space with just periodic fluctations(something called a De Sitter space which is basically empty space with just virtual particles popping in and out of existence). I read a similiar theory in Roger Penroses Cycles of Time, but I found that book far harder to read.
This is a good book, especially the first half. The author avoids the use of mathematics to describe his theories and so is forced to use analogies in the Stephen Hawkins style. I am sure this means leaving out some of the depth as analogies are rarely perfect. But most of us lack the ability to perform the mathematics, so this is probably a wise step especially when it comes to book sales. I found the second half grew a little more speculative, but it is a book I have read on more than one occasion. It seems a bit more advanced than other books that endless recount twin astronauts travelling at different speeds. And the range of material is quite vast.
Labels:
Physics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment