Blog Archive
Popular Posts
-
I found this book for free on the web via the excellent Moneysavingexpert website. This book broadly argues that whilst stock mark...
-
Many investing books focus on “get rich quick” strategies. These tend to be around picking specific shares or times to enter or exit the m...
-
This is a relatively brief book that looks at the causes of The First World War. It does not contain any new research and there is not much...
-
Slavery is topical at the moment with the release of 12 Years as a Slave. It was not an area I knew much about, and I assumed the end o...
-
I Am The Secret Footballer supposedly lift the lid on the life of a premiership footballer. It is anonymous and so is supposed to offer ...
-
So you want to get rich and become a millionaire? Perhaps this book will tell you how. The approach taken has been to sample or survey a l...
-
Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class analyses the way the white working classes have been demonised and ridiculed in popular cul...
-
Particle at the end of the Universe aims to explain the Higgs Boson and how it has been discovered. I have read this book once, but feel...
-
This book looks at time; why time seems to flow in one direction? Why can we not remember the future? This is a more complex puzzle than i...
-
King Arthur is a popular source of myth and legend. This book looks to investigate the truth behind the legend. The overall conclusion is ...
Powered by Blogger.
Search This Blog
Tuesday, 11 March 2014
This is a relatively brief book that looks at the causes of The First
World War. It does not contain any new research and there is not much
that is new in it.
The author's thesis is broadly that all of the world powers were preparing for war from the 1900s onwards. The military leaders of all the great powers were building plans for war, and that this lead to an environment in which was inevitable. Meanwhile many working class people were effected by nationalist, patriotism and social Darwinism which acted to encourage the belief that foreigners were an "other" to be feared or defeated.
The principle thesis is that leaders allowed the war to happen, or at least were too weak to stop it. There was little communication at the top and no attempt to defuse the situation, and the author argues this means that the leaders were guilty by omission of starting the war.
A key problem for me is this book feels to much like an essay rather than a book. It is very brief and contains little real insight. It is a nice primer, but I felt a bit disappointed. As we approach the 100 year anniversary there is going to be a lot of information around this period. Two key questions are whether the war was justified and who bears the blame for starting the war. The author clearly argues the leaders of all the Great Powers were responsible. But I don't think there is enough evidence presented to convince me.
I personally preferred The Pity of War by Niall Ferguson, which argues that Britain bears much of the responsibility for war The Forgotten Victory by Gary Sheffield which lays the blame with German militarism. These books just feel more meaty to me.
The author's thesis is broadly that all of the world powers were preparing for war from the 1900s onwards. The military leaders of all the great powers were building plans for war, and that this lead to an environment in which was inevitable. Meanwhile many working class people were effected by nationalist, patriotism and social Darwinism which acted to encourage the belief that foreigners were an "other" to be feared or defeated.
The principle thesis is that leaders allowed the war to happen, or at least were too weak to stop it. There was little communication at the top and no attempt to defuse the situation, and the author argues this means that the leaders were guilty by omission of starting the war.
A key problem for me is this book feels to much like an essay rather than a book. It is very brief and contains little real insight. It is a nice primer, but I felt a bit disappointed. As we approach the 100 year anniversary there is going to be a lot of information around this period. Two key questions are whether the war was justified and who bears the blame for starting the war. The author clearly argues the leaders of all the Great Powers were responsible. But I don't think there is enough evidence presented to convince me.
I personally preferred The Pity of War by Niall Ferguson, which argues that Britain bears much of the responsibility for war The Forgotten Victory by Gary Sheffield which lays the blame with German militarism. These books just feel more meaty to me.
Labels:
History
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment