Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(15)
-
▼
April
(10)
- The Political Brain The Role Of Emotion In Decidin...
- Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell
- The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History by Pet...
- Triumph Of The City
- Unconventional Success: A Fundamental Approach to ...
- Brown at 10
- Heat: How to Stop the Planet Burning by George Mon...
- Chav: The Demonisation of the Working Class by Owe...
- Smarter Investing:Simpler Decisions for Better Res...
- Lucifer Effect
-
▼
April
(10)
Popular Posts
-
I found this book for free on the web via the excellent Moneysavingexpert website. This book broadly argues that whilst stock mark...
-
Many investing books focus on “get rich quick” strategies. These tend to be around picking specific shares or times to enter or exit the m...
-
This is a relatively brief book that looks at the causes of The First World War. It does not contain any new research and there is not much...
-
Slavery is topical at the moment with the release of 12 Years as a Slave. It was not an area I knew much about, and I assumed the end o...
-
I Am The Secret Footballer supposedly lift the lid on the life of a premiership footballer. It is anonymous and so is supposed to offer ...
-
So you want to get rich and become a millionaire? Perhaps this book will tell you how. The approach taken has been to sample or survey a l...
-
Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class analyses the way the white working classes have been demonised and ridiculed in popular cul...
-
Particle at the end of the Universe aims to explain the Higgs Boson and how it has been discovered. I have read this book once, but feel...
-
This book looks at time; why time seems to flow in one direction? Why can we not remember the future? This is a more complex puzzle than i...
-
King Arthur is a popular source of myth and legend. This book looks to investigate the truth behind the legend. The overall conclusion is ...
Powered by Blogger.
Search This Blog
Saturday, 21 April 2012
This book analyses the last century of
the Western Roman empire. The fundamental thesis is that it was not
the direct influence of the Huns or internal divisions in the Roman
empire that lead to the collapse of the empire.
Instead the impact of Rome on the
border regions lead to those societies becoming more sophisticated
and politically unified. In the first and second century the Roman
empire was vastly richer than the less civilised Germanic world.
Indeed the beyond the edge of the empire was territory it was not
economically viable to conquer(being far removed from the
Mediterranean trade routes). The Germanic tribes were politically
divided into many small groups. This individual small groups were
unable to trouble the Roman empire, except by low level raiding. The
Germanic armies were not professional soldier and lacked iron
weapons, armour and training. This allowed the Romans to often win
battles even when outnumbered by more than five to one.
The centuries that followed saw the gap
between the Roman world and Germanic world narrowing. Trade and
warfare between the two saw the Germanic world becoming more advance.
The Germans gradually acquired more weapons and armour through trade
and acting as mercenaries within the Roman empire. Meanwhile the
various tribes fought to get closer to the Roman border which was a
source of wealth. This saw a gradual consolidation into larger
political groups.
The Romans were unable to simply
address the threat presented by the Germanic tribes as they faced a
rising empire to the East(Persia). They struggled throughout the
period to defend their borders and to raise their tax rates to a high
enough level to pay for an enlarged military. However they did manage
to contain the Persian threat, although they were not able to defeat
Persia decisively.
Germanic tribes from the start of the
fifth century crossed the border and settled in Roman territory,
initially some were accepted to assist in battling other groups. War
with Persia distracted Rome from the issue. Eventually the sheer
number of non-Roman within the empire lead to revolts and breakaway
kingdoms that reduced the Roman tax base and so size of the
professional army. This made it harder and harder to fight back and
reunite the empire. The empire unravelled surprisingly quickly as
North Africa, Spain and France fell became separate kingdoms.
The role of the Huns was indirect in
that there rise forced the Germanic tribes into the Roman empire to
escape their advance. But the Huns were numerically too small to
destroy the Roman empire, and ultimately lacked the political
organisation to survive and so did not establish a successor state to
the Roman empire. Instead the Western world of the dark ages was then
dominated by the political confederations of Goths, Alans, etc that
began to cross the border in the 5th century.
Labels:
History
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment